lundi 17 avril 2017
What is at the core of AMC's storytelling?
On June 25, 2014, on TIME's
website Abby Abrams wrote “Breaking Bad Is the Most
Binge-Watched TV Show Ever” based on a study led by TiVo.
“In the survey, 91% of people said that they had binge-watched a
show at some point, NBC
reports, and 35% said they had binge-watched Breaking Bad. Close
behind were Netflix drama House of Cards with 29%, and HBO
epic Game of Thrones at 25%.”
Two
years later, on pcmag.com,
Angela Moscaritolo wrote that “[a]ccording to Netflix, users devour
thrillers like Breaking Bad, Dexter, and Sons of
Anarchy quicker than any other genre”. Although the study did not focus on Breaking Bad's addictiveness per se,
one may add that the series'
screenwriters have certainly done a good job.
As the 8th season of Séries Mania begins and after a
French book on HBO's style entitled La
saga HBO : dans les coulisses de la chaîne qui a révolutionné les
séries was released last month, the time has come to wonder
about AMC's style as well.
The book actually
mentions that through the mid-1990s to 2017, HBO has revolutionized
TV storytelling, with series such as Oz, Sex and the City,
Six Feet Under, The Sopranos, The Wire,
Deadwood, Game of Thrones, True Detective,
Boardwalk Empire, Rome, True Blood.
One may even add Westworld. I know what you are thinking. That is quite a long list and
it reads as though they had actually invented screenwriting!
Compared
to HBO, AMC, Canal Plus, Netflix or even Amazon look like newbies.
But what makes
HBO's identity exactly? Certainly their documentary-like, revealing, and sexy tone. What about AMC's then? AMC's visual identity
is based on the golden AMC logo, together with the slogan “Something
more”. What may it be?
***
Last year, in order to
begin an English class session for Political Science students about
the gun control debate, I used a The Walking Dead
episode. Needless to say it got the students motivated to discuss
the issue, linking it to the omnipresence of guns and cars in the
show. My students were, and still are, in their early twenties, and
as young adults, they did what everybody does nowadays, that is
watching TV series. Apart from improving their listening and speaking
skills, TV series enable them to think about contemporary issues,
some of which are related to politics. However, our discussion came
to take an unforeseen turn.
After a moment, one
student uttered the idea that The Walking Dead may be
super addictive but it is also highly repetitive. The
remark struck me as candid, since
it obviously showed a certain amount of disappointment. The student
actually disliked the repetitive nature of the TV series as it gave
him too strong a feeling of iteration, highlighting the
articificiality of the text. Neverthless, he watched it keenly, which
showed that the very repetitive structure tailored to have
him stick to his
screen, was quite efficient.
As
a PhD student focusing on TV series, it had not crossed my mind that
non-professional TV viewers would
not be able to grasp that our taste for TV serials is mostly due to
their repetitive nature. Then in my inner self I thought 'how stupid
of me'. Please, lend me your eyes and let me redress my wrong.
Now
I feel stupid for not mentioning Umberto Eco at the time,
since he had rather aptly underlined the repetitive structure of the
TV series. Of course, TV series are called as such because “[t]o
serialize means, in some way, to repeat” (Umberto Eco, “Innovation
and repetition”, 1985) but they use repetition to trick the viewers
into watching them. The first trick they use is to make the viewers
think that they are watching a new story whereas it “is always the
same” (Eco, 1985); their second is to hide that it is precisely
what the viewers seek, as Eco states that
“[t]he series in this sense responds to the infantile need of
hearing again always the same story, of being consoled by the 'return
of the Identical,' superficially digsuised.” (Eco, 1985)
Hence, to get back to
my student's remark, one may want to turn his primary idea from “The Walking Dead may be super addictive but
it is also highly repetitive” into “The Walking Dead
is super addictive precisely because it is highly
repetitive”.
***
In series like CSI,
repetition is blatant since the very same structure is used with new
characters while in serials like Breaking Bad the structure is
made less obvious, as it is partly covered with the ongoing story.
However, the story is like a house relying on foundations invisible
to the naked eye – repetition.
Repetition gets you
hooked because it speaks to your inner child. When I was a chold, I
read The Little Prince, by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. I don't
if you did, but just in case, do you remember the fox when he spoke
about taming? When he and the prince first met, they agree on the
prince's coming again. To the fox's disappointment, he comes back at
a time different from the first time.
“It would have been better to come back at the same hour,” said
the fox. “If, for example, you come at four o'clock in the
afternoon, then at three o'clock I shall begin to be happy. I shall
feel happier and happier as the hour advances. At four o'clock, I
shall already be worrying and jumping about. I shall show you how
happy I am! But if you come at just any time, I shall never know at
what hour my heart is to be ready to greet you... One must observe
the proper rites...”
Rituals build up expectation, they get you
involved and generate attachment. The series' rituals are twofold. On
one hand, there is repetition; on the other, schedule. On TV, a
series builds up an audience only because it is broadcast at a
specific time, on a specific day. Without this milestone, series are
less likely to hook an audience.
However,
today's situation is different from ten to fifteen years ago. For the
audience, downloading and stream-watching is even more obvious than
before; watching several epsiodes in a row and binge-watch has nearly
become the norm. Hence, what about TV rituals like schedules and
such?
To
be continued.
Lætitia
Boccanfuso
jeudi 13 avril 2017
HBO's peculiar policy about product placement
Although
HBO's vice-president for communications Michelle Boas claims that
they “do no product placement”1,
the channel's audience can still remember one or two famous
cases of the sort. The argument is that "[i]f Carrie on Sex
and the City is drinking Tropicana, it's because that's what
Carrie would drink."2
But Carrie does not only drink juice. She also evolves in a
high-class society where style is related to fashion which is related
to fashoin which in turn is related to brandnames. For my part,
before watching Sex and the City, I barely knew about New York
City, and even less so about its fashionable outfits. In one episode
I got to learn so many brandnames that I felt like Charlie in the
chocolate factory, mostly when Carrie Bradshaw visited Vogue,
since in the series she
became one of their columnists.
Needless to say that poor old Carrie is obviously not the one to
blame for such a capitalist society: avoiding mentioning brandnames
would seem silly and not verisimilar. The same goes for every HBO
fiction: verisimilitude is what matters the most, and I agree with
that although I live in a country – France – where brandname
dropping is so frowned upon that labels are masked with a piece of
duct tape.
Sometimes,
however, brandname
dropping goes up a
notch. Carrie Bradshaw may drink Tropicana but Samantha Jones
assuredly drinks Absolut vodka, and more precisely Absolut Hunk
cocktails. In "Hop, Skip, and a Week" (606) she gets
her boyfriend Jerry/Smith an ad campaign for Absolute vodka. The
viewers discover the opportunity as they get a glimpse at the
digitally added billboard on Times Square3.
In
her 2003 article, Clarie Atkinson explained that for the occasion,
negotiations took place “between the show's producers at HBO,
Absolut, and its entertainment agency, Ketchum”. Although it cannot
be deemed product placement as the process “did not involve
any money changing hands”, it is rather close. Nevertheless, this
quid pro quo – as I may call it – is not as gratuitous as it
first appears.
There is a strong
textual basis to the episode that is to be found in the book Sex
and the City, an anthology of the columns published by Candace
Bushnell in the New York Observer
between 1994 and 1996. The
chapter 14 of the book entitled Portrait of a “Bulgy Underwear
Model: The Bone Pops Out of His Giant Billboard” was actually
entitled “Portrait of a Bulgy Calvin Klein Hunk” when published
as a column in the New York Observer on March 13, 19954.
Whereas the book does not read the hunk once, this is in the original
column that one can find the original term, as well as the mention of
a brandname, making the Sex and the City
episode into a return to the origins, a faithful translation of the
column's spirit. Hence, the last season of the series makes a detour
by what it had left more or less after the first season, and that is
the original Candace Bushnell tone. The column reads
“He’s that guy who was splashed — muscled, naked except for a
white skein of underwear — on that giant billboard for Calvin Klein
in Times Square, and he was all over the buses”,
which is echoed by the series. In
her article, Claire Atkinson mentioned that an ad agency
“drafted to create a campaign tailored specifically for the
scriptwriters' needs” which should mean that a certain number of
features were already set and that the agency only had to fill in a
few blank spots. Hence, the billboard idea resurfaces form the past,
becoming the reminder of the column inside the diegesis, and winking
at the viewers, with the tagline "Absolut Hunk" referring
to the original chapter title.
The visual of the poster also reminds the attentive viewer of the
1995 context when there had been yet another Calvin Klein ads
controversy about their lack of propriety. However, the poster is not
only a reference to the past; it also anchors Sex and the City
in the present – that is the time of the series' original broadcast
in 2003. It also bears ressemblance to the 2002 Yves Saint Laurent's
M7 campaign ads, whose stark naked version was displayed in French
magazines and streets. I can still remember catching a glimpse of them on my way to college.
The intertextual
references are numerous and what looked like a simple fake campaign
using a real product no longer seems as simple as a banal
product placement. It is a hybrid phenomenon that blurs the limit
between fiction and reality, using the bread and butter of capitalism
to do so, that is commodities and brandnames.
These objects trigger
even more desire for both products, because one should not forget
that HBO series are products and some of their major currencies
are their appeal to audience, hipness, and word-of-mouth. One has to
admit that crossing the barrier in this highly written and prepared
fashion is exciting.
Regarding
product placement Westworld
is no I, Robot and
the products that are used in the diegesis actually ensure that a
certain coherence is kept throughout the narrative. Even more than a
simple coherence, the products provide a certain subconscious level
to the series, something that is conveyed to the viewers through the
eyes without anybody saying anything about it, generating a very
specific mood.
Hence, it plays the same role as any other intertext, to the only
difference that it specifically concerns commodities. This is one of
the reasons why Westworld is all the more compelling;
it offers a specific view on our own everyday lives – yes, it does
– using familiar elements.
To
be continued.
Lætitia
Boccanfuso
1Jim
Edward January 23, 2004,
http://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/world-media-analysis-hbos-no-ads-attitude-keeps-top-programmes-reach/200495
2Ibid.
lundi 10 avril 2017
What is at the core of AMC's storytelling?
On June 25, 2014, on TIME's
website Abby Abrams wrote “Breaking Bad Is the Most
Binge-Watched TV Show Ever” based on a study led by TiVo.
“In the survey, 91% of people said that they had binge-watched a
show at some point, NBC
reports, and 35% said they had binge-watched Breaking Bad. Close
behind were Netflix drama House of Cards with 29%, and HBO
epic Game of Thrones at 25%.”
Two
years later, on pcmag.com,
Angela Moscaritolo wrote that “[a]ccording to Netflix, users devour
thrillers like Breaking Bad, Dexter, and Sons of
Anarchy quicker than any other genre”. Although the study did not focus on Breaking Bad's addictiveness per se,
one may add that the series'
screenwriters have certainly done a good job.
As the 8th season of Séries Mania begins and after a
French book on HBO's style entitled La
saga HBO : dans les coulisses de la chaîne qui a révolutionné les
séries was released last month, the time has come to wonder
about AMC's style as well.
The book actually
mentions that through the mid-1990s to 2017, HBO has revolutionized
TV storytelling, with series such as Oz, Sex and the City,
Six Feet Under, The Sopranos, The Wire,
Deadwood, Game of Thrones, True Detective,
Boardwalk Empire, Rome, True Blood.
One may even add Westworld. I know what you are thinking. That is quite a long list and
it reads as though they had actually invented screenwriting!
Compared
to HBO, AMC, Canal Plus, Netflix or even Amazon look like newbies.
But what makes
HBO's identity exactly? Certainly their documentary-like, revealing, and sexy tone. What about AMC's then? AMC's visual identity
is based on the golden AMC logo, together with the slogan “Something
more”. What may it be?
***
Last year, in order to
begin an English class session for Political Science students about
the gun control debate, I used a The Walking Dead
episode. Needless to say it got the students motivated to discuss
the issue, linking it to the omnipresence of guns and cars in the
show. My students were, and still are, in their early twenties, and
as young adults, they did what everybody does nowadays, that is
watching TV series. Apart from improving their listening and speaking
skills, TV series enable them to think about contemporary issues,
some of which are related to politics. However, our discussion came
to take an unforeseen turn.
After a moment, one
student uttered the idea that The Walking Dead may be
super addictive but it is also highly repetitive. The
remark struck me as candid, since
it obviously showed a certain amount of disappointment. The student
actually disliked the repetitive nature of the TV series as it gave
him too strong a feeling of iteration, highlighting the
articificiality of the text. Neverthless, he watched it keenly, which
showed that the very repetitive structure tailored to have
him stick to his
screen, was quite efficient.
As
a PhD student focusing on TV series, it had not crossed my mind that
non-professional TV viewers would
not be able to grasp that our taste for TV serials is mostly due to
their repetitive nature. Then in my inner self I thought 'how stupid
of me'. Please, lend me your eyes and let me redress my wrong.
Now
I feel stupid for not mentioning Umberto Eco at the time,
since he had rather aptly underlined the repetitive structure of the
TV series. Of course, TV series are called as such because “[t]o
serialize means, in some way, to repeat” (Umberto Eco, “Innovation
and repetition”, 1985) but they use repetition to trick the viewers
into watching them. The first trick they use is to make the viewers
think that they are watching a new story whereas it “is always the
same” (Eco, 1985); their second is to hide that it is precisely
what the viewers seek, as Eco states that
“[t]he series in this sense responds to the infantile need of
hearing again always the same story, of being consoled by the 'return
of the Identical,' superficially digsuised.” (Eco, 1985)
Hence, to get back to
my student's remark, one may want to turn his primary idea from “The Walking Dead may be super addictive but
it is also highly repetitive” into “The Walking Dead
is super addictive precisely because it is highly
repetitive”.
***
In series like CSI,
repetition is blatant since the very same structure is used with new
characters while in serials like Breaking Bad the structure is
made less obvious, as it is partly covered with the ongoing story.
However, the story is like a house relying on foundations invisible
to the naked eye – repetition.
Repetition gets you
hooked because it speaks to your inner child. When I was a chold, I
read The Little Prince, by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. I don't
if you did, but just in case, do you remember the fox when he spoke
about taming? When he and the prince first met, they agree on the
prince's coming again. To the fox's disappointment, he comes back at
a time different from the first time.
“It would have been better to come back at the same hour,” said
the fox. “If, for example, you come at four o'clock in the
afternoon, then at three o'clock I shall begin to be happy. I shall
feel happier and happier as the hour advances. At four o'clock, I
shall already be worrying and jumping about. I shall show you how
happy I am! But if you come at just any time, I shall never know at
what hour my heart is to be ready to greet you... One must observe
the proper rites...”
Rituals build up expectation, they get you
involved and generate attachment. The series' rituals are twofold. On
one hand, there is repetition; on the other, schedule. On TV, a
series builds up an audience only because it is broadcast at a
specific time, on a specific day. Without this milestone, series are
less likely to hook an audience.
However,
today's situation is different from ten to fifteen years ago. For the
audience, downloading and stream-watching is even more obvious than
before; watching several epsiodes in a row and binge-watch has nearly
become the norm. Hence, what about TV rituals like schedules and
such?
To
be continued.
Lætitia
Boccanfuso
Séries Mania Saison 8
Du 13 au 23 avril, pour le plus grand bonheur des sériephiles, Séries Mania revient pour sa huitième saison. Le festival s'agrandit encore cette année, avec l'ajout de nouveaux cinémas partenaires (l'UGC Normandie, le Luminor Hôtel de Ville, le Centre George Pompidou) et passe désormais le périphérique avec l'inclusion de l'UGC Ciné Cité de Rosny, poursuivant ainsi sa mission de donner accès au plus grand nombre à une programmation de qualité. C'est ainsi qu'il faut également percevoir les événements programmés en parallèle du festival sous la Canopée flambant neuve du Forum des Halles, lesquels seront accessibles sans billet à toute personne désireuse de s'intéresser à l'événement.
Comme les années passées, de nombreux invités de marque sont attendus: le showrunner Damon Lindelof (Lost, The Leftovers) qui présidera le jury de la compétition officielle (laquelle s'est enrichie de nouvelles récompenses); Agnieszka Holland (qui a réalisé des épisodes de The Affair, House of Cards, Treme, The Killing, The Wire, Cold Case...), membre du jury; l'actrice Julianna Margulies (The Good Wife, The Sopranos, E.R.) et l'acteur Justin Theroux (The Leftovers, Parks and Recreation, Six Feet Under, Alias, The District, Sex and the City...); Adam Price (créateur des séries Borgen et Ride Upon the Storm). Tous viendront à la rencontre de leur public à l'occasion de projections, masterclass et interviews.
Soixante séries, venues de dix-sept pays, sauront réjouir les sériephiles par l'éclectisme et la diversité de leurs thématiques.
Photo: couloir du RER A à Nation
©Diane Langlumé/Previously On TV
jeudi 14 avril 2016
Séries Mania Saison 7
Campagne de publicité agressive pour annoncer le lancement de la septième saison du festival Séries Mania, organisé par le Forum des Images et qui, débordant de ses murs d'origine cette année, se tiendra également au Grand Rex pour la soirée d'ouverture et au cinéma UGC Ciné-Cité les Halles.
Photo: terrasse de café, rue de la Gaîté
©Diane Langlumé/Previously On TV
Fourni par Blogger.